Location and Projects
Watkins Environmental Engineer
The team at Watkins Environmental is recognized throughout the Western United States as a leader in the environmental remediation and demolition industry.
From BuildZoom: Watkins Environmental, 4345 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA (Employees: Damon Francis Barone and Gregory Scott Watkins) holds a Renovation license and 3 other licenses according to the Environmental Protection Agency license board.
Their BuildZoom score of 89 does not rank in the top 50% of California contractors.
Their license was verified as active when we last checked. If you are thinking of hiring Watkins Environmental, we recommend double-checking their license status with the license board and using our project planner to get competitive quotes.
Watkins Environmental Contact Information
Watkins Environmental San Diego
Quality
Activity
|
1 project
|
2024 |
|
6 projects
|
2023 |
This is an overview of this contractor's activity. Click here to access our complete licensing and building permit database.
Pricing
|
1 project
|
$20k-$50k |
Watkins Environmental Reviews
1 out of 5 stars, based on
1
review
-
By Megan O.September 4, 2022Asbestos abatement$1,150
Building Permits by Watkins Environmental
This is a sample of this contractor's permits. Click here to access their complete permit history.
Recent Buildzoom Projects
Watkins Environmental License info
Verified License
| License # | NAT-125151-3 |
| Status | Active |
| Nation | Environmental Protection Agency |
| Type | Renovation |
| Business Type | Corporation |
- BuildZoom verified this license was active as of January 2026.
Verify this license's status for Watkins Environmental at the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
This is a sample of licensing data; click here to access a complete history.
License Not Verified
| License # | 966461 |
| Status | Active |
| State | California |
| Type | General Engineering, General Building, Building Moving, Demolition, Asbestos Abatement |
| Class | A, B, C21, C22 |
| Business Type | Corporation |
- When BuildZoom last verified this license, it had an expiration date of October, 2025. Check the current license status of Watkins Environmental with the California Contractors State License Board
This is a sample of licensing data; click here to access a complete history.
Inactive License
| License # | NAT-125151-2 |
| Status | Inactive |
| Nation | Environmental Protection Agency |
| Type | Renovation |
| Business Type | Corporation |
- According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the status of this license was at one point cancelled. However, this information may have changed.
Check this license's status for Watkins Environmental at the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
This is a sample of licensing data; click here to access a complete history.
Inactive License
| License # | 667708 |
| Status | Inactive |
| State | California |
| Type | Flooring And Floor Covering, Construction Clean Up, General Building, Building Moving, Demolition, General Engineering |
| Business Type | Corporation |
- According to the California Contractors State License Board, the status of this license was at one point cancelled. However, this information may have changed.
Check this license's status for Watkins Environmental at the California Contractors State License Board.
This is a sample of licensing data; click here to access a complete history.
89
BuildZoom Score
Bonded
| Bonded Agent | Hudson Insurance Company |
| Bond Value | $15,000 |
Insured
| Workers Comp Provider | State Compensation Insurance Fund |
27
Permits
- Building permit records show that Watkins Environmental has worked on 27 permitted projects.
I have an older tri-level home and discovered trace amounts of Chrysotile asbestos (0.30%) in the joint compound. CA rules are pretty strict—anything above 0.1% is treated as hazardous, so after researching I chose Watkins because they were responsive, cost competitive and had great reviews. However, based on my nightmarish experience that’s where the positives end.
Short version:
Watkins did not follow the agreed procedures. Their techs did not install proper containment around work areas and walked around my entire home with visible drywall dust on their clothes + shoes. Now my home has unsafe levels of asbestos where they worked (and likely in more areas). Another licensed contractor recommended I throw away all contaminated porous items in my home (carpet, couch, bedding, clothes etc.) and it will cost $2k to fix the damaged entryway wall.
Long version:
Watkins came on 6/30 to:
1. Remove vinyl wallpaper glued to joint compound (white sections) in the entryway
2. Cut + remove drywall in the laundry room
3. Cut + remove drywall in the master bath
Watkins techs began in the lower level laundry room and I immediately had concerns. They used a motorized tool to cut into drywall without fully sealing off the area—just a single plastic tarp with a slit cut down the middle (see pic). They also didn’t use negative pressure as discussed + had no HEPA filter or vacuum in the work area. After sawing drywall, the lead tech emerged from the laundry room with visible dust covering his hands, shirt, jeans and boots and walked up carpeted stairs to the main level to get the HEPA vacuum to use after the fact (see pic of footprint). I raised these concerns with the lead and was assured they’d use negative pressure in the other areas.
Next they did the master bath on the upper level—walking along unprotected carpet with the same dusty boots + clothes. The lead tech left and the sole remaining tech proceeded to cut/hammer on the drywall without fully sealing the area off and again didn’t use negative pressure, a HEPA filter or vacuum (see pic), despite being told by his lead to do so. When the lead returned, he apologized and said the miscommunication may have been bc the other tech speaks limited English. I called the VP of Watkins with my growing concerns and he sent a supervisor, but nobody alerted me when the supervisor arrived/he never spoke with me (I was isolating in a room upstairs).
Next they removed the entry wallpaper and finally used a critical barrier + negative pressure to vent the air through a window. At this time I was unable to go downstairs since the critical barrier blocked my only exit—this was discussed beforehand and I was told it could take 4+ hrs and then they’d remove the barrier so I wouldn’t be trapped. But during those few hours they decided to leave the barrier up overnight even though I was still upstairs. As they were about to leave, knowing I was stuck upstairs, I had to call out for help and had them bring a ladder so I could escape out a second story window.
The next day I spoke to the VP again who admitted things went poorly, and that he would use the videos + images I took to improve his team’s training around what not to do. He asked how they could make things right, and I requested asbestos tests be conducted where his team worked and he agreed.
Watkins sent people to clean my home twice before tests were taken, yet both of the surface tests on 7/8 found unsafe levels of asbestos inside my home. Chrysotile asbestos was found in the laundry on the washing machine at 32,300 s/cm2 and on the carpet near the master bedroom at 139,000 s/cm2. NOTE: > 10,000 s/cm2 is considered unsafe.
Prior to the abatement I tested near the entryway to see if I accidentally disturbed any asbestos when removing a section of wallpaper. The surface test found no asbestos and the air test found 1 structure of Amosite asbestos, 5x lower than safe limits. Yet Watkins now claims this 1 asbestos structure, which is completely different than the Chrysotile currently all over my house, is proof that I contaminated my home *before* they walked over my carpets in dusty boots and they are therefore not responsible.
Despite several attempts since receiving these test results to have Watkins remediate the damage it created, things have not proceeded at all. Beyond the contamination, the techs gouged/damaged the entryway drywall, which the VP agreed to pay to fix until he realized it would cost $2K. Now he’s only willing to waive the $1,150 original invoice to go toward this cost, leaving me with the remaining $850 + the cost to hire another licensed abatement company to remove the carpets/clean up the asbestos Watkins left behind + replace the carpet, which he’s never offered to do.
Watkins’ techs were undertrained and I don’t feel they took the health risks of asbestos seriously. I’ve been out of my home since their work on June 30 and will be until it can be fully remediated and is safe to return.